Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Mason
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice towards speedy renomination. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Maggie Mason (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable blogger. No coverage in independent sources. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I forgot to add that it's a contested prod.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Gongshow Talk 04:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - A published author who easily meets WP:GNG. See, for example, cio.com.au, palestineherald.com, bonappetit.com, npr.org, nytimes.com (2004), and nytimes.com (2010). And that's what I found with just a couple of quick Google searches. Sure, the article could use some work, but that's not the point of AFD. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 05:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I did see those sources but they didn't convince me that she meets either the GNG or WP:AUTHOR. cio.com.au quotes her and doesn't discuss her. The palestine herald source has a little more, but it's essentially reporting her views and not discussing her as a person. The bon appetit article is an interview by another blogger; it's not from the magazine. The NPR thing is also essentially a quote, not about her. The 2004 NYT article quotes her in passing. The 2010 NYT thing duplicates the NPR thing. These are not reviews of her work, they're not discussions of her blog, they're routine mentions.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Those were just a half-dozen easily-found examples. Here's some more: How about a book review in the Seattle PI? A mention on webpronews.com? Got Highbeam? There, I found a 2006 interview on NPR (not the same one as before), and mentions in the Boston Globe, the San José Mercury News, and the Washington Post. This Intel press release referred to her as an Intel advisor and industry influencer. Add that all up, and I think we've established notability. And btw, when a reliable source has a blog, that blog tends to be considered a reliable source as well—so I think that the interview with Bon Appetit is absolutely useful. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 21:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I did see those sources but they didn't convince me that she meets either the GNG or WP:AUTHOR. cio.com.au quotes her and doesn't discuss her. The palestine herald source has a little more, but it's essentially reporting her views and not discussing her as a person. The bon appetit article is an interview by another blogger; it's not from the magazine. The NPR thing is also essentially a quote, not about her. The 2004 NYT article quotes her in passing. The 2010 NYT thing duplicates the NPR thing. These are not reviews of her work, they're not discussions of her blog, they're routine mentions.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.