Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romance-speaking Europe (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Romance-speaking Europe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is obviously a FORK. We already have an article for this topic (Romance languages). Fakirbakir (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- keep, editor is on some kind of deletion rampage. Even if it was a content fork (which it isn't), the appropriate way of dealing with content forks is merging, not deleting (preserve edit history!) --dab (𒁳) 09:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per dab. Nergaal (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Why exactly has this been chosen for possible deletion? What will we have for reference for the Romance-linguistic areas in Europe? Why not propose to delete Latin America? This all appears to be very contradictory, and therefore complete nonsense. The Romance language wikis have a similar page. There should clean-up many linguistic groups and areas, and we should reach consensus on how to reach this. The content of this article should not be deleted, the most that could be allowed to occur is for a merger, but the article is perfectly fine. Viller the Great (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.